Skip to main content

HC directs govt to consider granting disability benefits to defence officer trainees on par with civilian officers

Vijay Mohan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, August 28

In a significant development which may lead to removal of a long-pending anomaly for disabled officer trainees of the defence services and their widows, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the central government to resolve the matter.

In a petition filed by the widow of a deceased gentleman cadet who was boarded out of the Indian Military Academy for a disability suffered during training which was declared "attributable to military service", it was pointed out that while most civilian employees who are disabled during training or service cannot be discharged from service due to a disability, there was no such protection for military personnel under the Persons with Disabilities Act.

Further, those civilian trainees and officer-trainees of organisations such as the Central Armed Police Forces who are discharged on account of disabilities, are paid proper disability pension and their widows are paid family pension on demise, whereas officer-trainees of the defence services are paid a much lower monthly 'ex gratia' rather than disability pension.

The petition also states that even below officer rank recruits of the defence services are paid proper disability pension while officer-trainees of the defence services are paid a much lower amount.

Providing the figures, the petition avers that while civilian officer-trainees and military jawan-trainees are paid Rs 36,465 and Rs 18,000 per month as disability pension respectively, military officer-trainees are paid only Rs 12,240.

It was also pointed out that while widows of disabled civil officer-trainees and military jawan trainees are paid Rs 16,830 and Rs 9,000 respectively as family pension on their demise, there is no policy to pay any amount at all to widows of disabled military-trainees.

The High Court has directed the Ministry of Defence, the Chief of the Army Staff and the Adjutant General to consider all points raised in the petition within two months.

The Bench also expressed hope that "unnecessary litigation" on the issue would be avoided.

Sources point out that though this anomaly affects a very low number of trainees invalided out of military academies, the discrimination remains very stark and the then Defence Minister, Late Manohar Parrikar, wanted to rectify the policy.

A Committee of Experts under Parrikar in 2015 had come down heavily upon the staff of the ministry and had remarked that "the non-resolution displays utter insensitivity and obstinacy of the establishment and shows how graciousness and large-heartedness is lacking in all of us".

The matter, however, continues to hang fire. After Parrikar moved out of the defence ministry, the same objections that had been set aside by him were reiterated on file by ministry staff, sources said.

A disabled bedridden officer-trainee remarked that the orders of the High Court had brought hope to him that perhaps the top civil and army officers would now be able to rein in the staff and get the anomaly rectified soon on the strength of judicial orders.



Source:- The Tribune https://ift.tt/2Qt0LCm
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cong questions Centre over CBI probe into Sushant case

New Delhi, August 30 The Congress on Sunday questioned the "alacrity" exhibited by the Centre in ordering a CBI probe into the Sushant Singh Rajput case and sought investigation into alleged BJP links of Sandeep Ssingh, producer of a biopic on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is under the scanner in a related drugs case. Congress spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi asked who in the BJP is trying to "save" Ssingh, who produced "PM Narendra Modi", the posters of which were unveiled by the then Maharashtra CM, Devendra Fadnavis. Singhvi alleged that the film producer who claimed to be Rajput's close friend made 53 calls to the Maharashtra BJP office in the last few months. "Who he was seeking security from," Singhvi asked. He said political parties do not get into Bollywood matters. "But if a suspect is linked to the ruling party, the country wants to know who is he connected to and who in the BJP is trying to save Ssingh. Was Ssingh the rea...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jakhar slams party dissenters

Aditi Tandon Tribune News Service New Delhi, August 30 Knives are out in the Congress over a section of dissenters making daily public statements against the leadership, with Punjab party president Sunil Jakhar on Sunday becoming the first Congress functionary to publicly demand action against the out of line people. "The Congress president will have to draw a line somewhere. Strong action must be taken against party persons, no matter how senior, who continue to needle the leadership daily even after our president Sonia Gandhi graciously told them she bore no ill-will against anyone. These dissenters are aware that the Congress is going through difficult times. They think they are untouchables and can continue to exploit the party's predicament. They must be dealt with sternly," said Jakhar days after another veteran Ambika Soni demanded disciplinary action against letter writers in the meeting of the Congress Working Committee. Jakhar also slammed the dissenters fo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Prashant Bhushan contempt case: SC set to pronounce quantum of sentence today

New Delhi, August 31 The Supreme Court is scheduled to pronounce on Monday its verdict on the quantum of sentence to be awarded to activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan, convicted for contempt of court over his two tweets against the judiciary. A Bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra will pronounce its verdict against Bhushan, who faces simple imprisonment of up to six months or with a fine of up to Rs 2,000 or with both as punishment under Contempt of Court Act. On August 25, the top court was urged by senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan to show "judicial statesmanship" and not make Bhushan a "martyr" by punishing him for contempt over his tweets criticising the judiciary, after the activist-lawyer rejected fresh suggestions from the court for an apology. As the top court reserved its verdict on the sentence to be awarded to Bhushan, Justice Arun Mishra, who presided over a three-judge bench, at the fag end of the nearly three-hour-long hearing had asked why he cannot seek ...
Post a Comment
Read more